Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Block navigation shortcuts when plaid modal is loading/shown #18462

Conversation

huzaifa-99
Copy link
Contributor

@huzaifa-99 huzaifa-99 commented May 5, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #17598
PROPOSAL: #17598 (comment)

Tests

Verify if Group creation shortcut is blocked when there is no plaid modal shown

  1. Open the app -> settings -> payments -> add bank account
  2. When the plaid modal is loading try to use to CTRL/CMD + SHIFT + K shortcut to create group chat, verify if this shortcut is blocked (it must be). The page url will be /settings/payments/add-bank-account
  3. After successfully filling in the plaid account details on the plaid modal, and navigated back, try to use the CTRL/CMD + SHIFT + K shortcut again, verify if it works (it must work this time).

Verify if search shortcut is blocked when there is no plaid modal shown

  1. Open the app -> settings -> payments -> add bank account
  2. When the plaid modal is loading try to use to CTRL/CMD + K shortcut to open search, verify if this shortcut is blocked (it must be). The page url will be /settings/payments/add-bank-account
  3. After successfully filling in the plaid account details on the plaid modal, and navigated back, try to use the CTRL/CMD + K shortcut again, verify if it works (it must work this time).

Verify if Group creation shortcut is blocked when plaid modal is loading in VBBA flow

  1. Create Workspace
  2. Go to Workspace's settings and click "Connect bank account"
  3. Verify that the shortcut CTRL/CMD + K works
  4. Go back to Workspace's settings and click "Connect bank account"
  5. Click "Connect online with Plaid", and while the spinner is shown, try to press CTRL/CMD + K: it should do nothing
  6. Follow the plaid modal flow to add a bank account from Wells Fargo, select the "saving" and "checking" bank accounts. After finishing with the plaid modal, you should land in this view:
    image
  7. Confirm that the shortcut CTRL/CMD + K works again
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as the "Tests" section above.

QA Steps

Same as the "Tests" section above.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

Chrome

Desktop.Chrome.-.compressed.mp4

Safari

Desktop.Safari.-.compressed.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
17598.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
IOS.Safari.mp4
Desktop
Mac.Desktop.-.compressed.mp4
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-05-05.at.6.33.49.AM.mov
Android
2.mp4

@huzaifa-99 huzaifa-99 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 5, 2023 00:23
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from 0xmiros and aldo-expensify and removed request for a team May 5, 2023 00:23
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 5, 2023

@aldo-expensify @0xmiroslav One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@huzaifa-99
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sry for the lint issues above. This was my first PR here with more than 10 line changes, so forgot to properly lint. Will be careful next time.

Comment on lines 92 to 97
// block keyboard shortcuts that can navigate when plaid modal is shown
if (lodashGet(this.props.plaidData, 'bankAccounts', []).length > 0) {
this.unblockKeyboardShortcuts();
} else {
this.blockKeyboardShortcuts();
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have some preference for subscribing the keyboard shortcuts in componentDidMount and setting the parameter shouldBubble to () => lodashGet(this.props.plaidData, 'bankAccounts', []).length > 0 so it allows the default shortcuts to work when we have the bank accounts.

I just find it slightly easier to understand when this can happen if it is in componentDidMount and componentWillUnmount compared to componentDidUpdate

@0xmiroslav thoughts?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would also work, @aldo-expensify @0xmiroslav please let me know if I should update it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aldo-expensify @0xmiroslav bump ^

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, it's better solution. Thanks for suggestion
@huzaifa-99 let's do that!

shortcut.descriptionKey,
shortcut.modifiers,
false,
() => lodashGet(this.props.plaidData, 'bankAccounts', []).length > 0, // stop bubbling when there are bank accounts
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this correct comment?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@huzaifa-99 huzaifa-99 May 8, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice catch, it should be 'start' (fixed). Thanks for spotting @0xmiroslav

@huzaifa-99 huzaifa-99 requested a review from 0xmiros May 8, 2023 12:00
Comment on lines 132 to 135
// return early if shortcuts already blocked
if (this.subscribedKeyboardShortcuts.length > 0) {
return;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is safety check but when does this happen?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since we are now subscribing in the componentDidMount, this check would not be triggered. Its safe to remove, @0xmiroslav should I do that?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, we don't need redundant code if we 100% confirm that it's redundant

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done @0xmiroslav

Comment on lines 134 to 145
const unsubscribeCallbacks = _.map(
shortcutsToBlock,
shortcut => KeyboardShortcut.subscribe(
shortcut.shortcutKey,
() => {}, // do nothing
shortcut.descriptionKey,
shortcut.modifiers,
false,
() => lodashGet(this.props.plaidData, 'bankAccounts', []).length > 0, // start bubbling when there are bank accounts
),
);
this.subscribedKeyboardShortcuts = unsubscribeCallbacks;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB: no need to define unsubscribeCallbacks variable. set to this.subscribedKeyboardShortcuts directly

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done @0xmiroslav

@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented May 8, 2023

@huzaifa-99 please merge main

@huzaifa-99 huzaifa-99 requested a review from 0xmiros May 8, 2023 17:17
@huzaifa-99
Copy link
Contributor Author

@0xmiroslav main merged

@huzaifa-99 huzaifa-99 requested a review from aldo-expensify May 8, 2023 17:45
Copy link
Contributor

@0xmiros 0xmiros left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Checklisting

@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented May 8, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
mchrome.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
msafari.mov
Desktop
desktop1.mov
desktop2.mov
iOS
ios.mov
Android
android.mov

@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented May 8, 2023

@aldo-expensify over to you!

@aldo-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

@huzaifa-99 I think you may need to pull main again. The unit tests are still failing.

Copy link
Contributor

@aldo-expensify aldo-expensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Worked well for me.

Added testing instructions for the VBBA flow.

@huzaifa-99 , you will need to update from main again to fix the tests.

@huzaifa-99
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aldo-expensify Main merged. Tests are also passing

@aldo-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @huzaifa-99 !

@aldo-expensify aldo-expensify merged commit 144979b into Expensify:main May 9, 2023
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented May 9, 2023

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/aldo-expensify in version: 1.3.13-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 1.3.13-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants