Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix/16098: Listen keydown from user to focus again the composer #17138

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Apr 12, 2023

Conversation

tienifr
Copy link
Contributor

@tienifr tienifr commented Apr 7, 2023

Details

We should automatically focus on the Composer if we press on regular characters like a, b, c, d, ... (not non-character keys like Enter, Shift) when we're not typing on any input or textarea.

Fixed Issues

$ #16098
PROPOSAL: #16098 (comment)

Tests

  1. Go to any chats
  2. Click on any message
  3. Press any character keys like a,b,c,d (not non-character keys like Enter, Shift)
  4. Verify that the composer is focused again and the above character is entered in the composer
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Go to any chats
  2. Click on any message
  3. Press any character keys like a,b,c,d (not non-character keys like Enter, Shift)
  4. Verify that the composer is focused again and the above character is entered in the composer
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-04-08.at.00.50.34.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
RPReplay_Final1680890370.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
RPReplay_Final1680890255.mp4
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-04-08.at.01.07.15.mov
iOS
Screen-Recording-2023-04-08-at-01.06.13.mp4
Android
Screen.Recording.2023-04-08.at.01.27.23.mov

@tienifr tienifr marked this pull request as ready for review April 7, 2023 18:16
@tienifr tienifr requested a review from a team as a code owner April 7, 2023 18:16
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from PauloGasparSv and rushatgabhane and removed request for a team April 7, 2023 18:16
@MelvinBot
Copy link

@PauloGasparSv @rushatgabhane One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor

Won't be able to review this Today but will prioritize it on Monday!

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

rushatgabhane commented Apr 10, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-04-10.at.13.21.06.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome N.A.
Mobile Web - Safari

N.A.

Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-04-10.at.14.15.16.mov
iOS

no crash

image
Android

No crash

image

Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tienifr nice polish to the UX!

Left a few minor style change requests

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
function listenKeyDown(callback) {
document.addEventListener('keydown', callback);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tienifr nitpick: style change -

condense listenKeyDown and removeListenKeyDown to a single file.

@@ -255,6 +261,7 @@ class ReportActionCompose extends React.Component {
}

componentWillUnmount() {
removeListenKeyDown(this.keydownListener);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should perform this only if keydownListener is not null

Suggested change
removeListenKeyDown(this.keydownListener);
if (this.keydownListener) {
removeListenKeyDown(this.keydownListener);

rushatgabhane
rushatgabhane previously approved these changes Apr 10, 2023
Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@PauloGasparSv LGTM! 🎉

appreciate the quick work @tienifr 🚀

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, the changes here are looking great!!! I'm testing on all platforms here too.

I'm testing if it's ok to introduce the following behavior though. In Web/Desktop if we have a chat open and we access the Profile Settings (or any other "page") and start typing stuff it will focus on the composer and add the input there.

That makes total sense but may be confusing to the user, for example in Desktop Web:

Screen.Recording.2023-04-10.at.10.26.27.mov

And Desktop Web with a small screen (mobile mode). This one may be a problem but I don't think it's worth solving since no one will probably use the Web version like this.

mWeb.Desktop.mov

I'm checking if this happens on mWeb too and if there is a simple fix for this. If there isn't IMO we should send a message in #expensify-open-source to get other people's opinions (mine is Do Nothing).

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

@tienifr is there a simple solution to the problems @PauloGasparSv mentioned maybe?

Can we check if the page is active?

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Apr 10, 2023

@rushatgabhane Please help to check my small fix for the above problem

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

rushatgabhane commented Apr 10, 2023

@tienifr instead of checking visibility inside component did update, can we modify the callback function for the event listener to return early if modal isn't visible?

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Apr 10, 2023

@rushatgabhane Your suggestion is so great. Just updated

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor

Amazing!!! Re-testing here in a bit!

Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tienifr non-blocking bug:

  1. Go to mWeb
  2. Open LHN
  3. Type "123"
  4. Go to the most recent chat

Typing while on LHN page in mWeb types into the composer

@tienifr is there an easy way to find if LHN is being focused?

Screen.Recording.2023-04-11.at.00.22.31.mov

rushatgabhane
rushatgabhane previously approved these changes Apr 10, 2023
Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@PauloGasparSv nice catch with the bug related to RHN

LGTM!

Screen.Recording.2023-04-11.at.00.19.49.mov
Screen.Recording.2023-04-11.at.00.18.18.mov

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Apr 12, 2023

@PauloGasparSv Just updated

Copy link
Contributor

@PauloGasparSv PauloGasparSv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-04-12.at.13.55.45.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-04-12.at.14.02.49.mov
iOS Native
Screen.Recording.2023-04-12.at.14.31.49.mov
iOS mWeb
Screen.Recording.2023-04-12.at.14.34.56.mov
Android Native
Screen.Recording.2023-04-12.at.14.57.10.mov
Android mWeb
Screen.Recording.2023-04-12.at.14.45.41.mov

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @tienifr can you also mention in the QA steps that the behaviour should only work for Desktop and Desktop Web?

@PauloGasparSv PauloGasparSv merged commit f496b9f into Expensify:main Apr 12, 2023
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented Apr 12, 2023

Hey guys! just noticed a regression reported it here,
We can fix that by checking if key.metaKey to check if the user is using shortcuts and return early.

Screenshot 2023-04-12 at 12 56 13 PM

cc: @PauloGasparSv @rushatgabhane @tienifr

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/PauloGasparSv in version: 1.3.0-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented Apr 13, 2023

Is this a deploy blocker?
Looks like related to this PR
https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1681367247044099

cc: @PauloGasparSv @rushatgabhane @tienifr

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor

Taking a look at that, I think everyone else is out right now.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Apr 14, 2023

There are many regressions being reported from this PR. Can we please revert this @rushatgabhane? Let me know if you need a hand with that.

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor

There are many regressions being reported from this PR. Can we please revert this @rushatgabhane?

Was about to comment that after seeing this.

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor

We should also revert #17360

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Yes and then work on a new PR with all the fixes merged and everything tested. We can just also skip the issue as I don't see a strong need to have that feature.

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor

tienifr added a commit to tienifr/App that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2023
This reverts commit f496b9f, reversing
changes made to 34c5155.
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.0-2 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/PauloGasparSv in version: 1.3.1-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

1 similar comment
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/PauloGasparSv in version: 1.3.1-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.1-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants