Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve performance of optionslist #13398

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Dec 8, 2022

Conversation

tgolen
Copy link
Contributor

@tgolen tgolen commented Dec 7, 2022

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/228943

Tests

  1. Click the magnifying glass to search for reports
  2. Verify you can search for a report and go to it
  3. Verify that searching feels pretty quick and definitely not any slower than it was before
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as the above. The only difference you will see is that avatars probably won't be displayed, which is fine.

QA Steps

Same as the above

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

2022-12-07_12-13-59

Mobile Web - Chrome

2022-12-07_12-14-34

Mobile Web - Safari

2022-12-07_12-15-43

Desktop

2022-12-07_12-14-11

iOS

2022-12-07_12-16-02

Android

2022-12-07_12-15-00

@tgolen tgolen self-assigned this Dec 7, 2022
@tgolen tgolen changed the base branch from main to tgolen-optimize-optionlist December 7, 2022 16:20
@tgolen tgolen changed the title Tgolen analyze performance optionslist Improve performance of optionslist Dec 7, 2022
@tgolen tgolen changed the base branch from tgolen-optimize-optionlist to main December 7, 2022 19:08
@tgolen tgolen changed the title Improve performance of optionslist [HOLD] Improve performance of optionslist Dec 7, 2022
@tgolen tgolen changed the title [HOLD] Improve performance of optionslist [HOLD App/13319] Improve performance of optionslist Dec 7, 2022
@tgolen tgolen changed the title [HOLD App/13319] Improve performance of optionslist Improve performance of optionslist Dec 7, 2022
@tgolen tgolen marked this pull request as ready for review December 7, 2022 20:56
@tgolen tgolen requested a review from a team as a code owner December 7, 2022 20:56
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from deetergp and mollfpr and removed request for a team December 7, 2022 20:56
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 7, 2022

@mollfpr @deetergp One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@deetergp
Copy link
Contributor

deetergp commented Dec 8, 2022

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

macos - web

Mobile Web - Chrome ![android - chrome](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/766197/206327218-80d5e97e-bb53-4826-85c4-678ae8c42a81.png)
Mobile Web - Safari ![ios - safari](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/766197/206327236-f5217707-49ca-429f-b32c-f63a8620889f.png)
Desktop

macos - desktop

iOS

ios - native

Android

android - native

deetergp
deetergp previously approved these changes Dec 8, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@deetergp deetergp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good to me. Aside from my one, nit-picky NAB, the linter is complaining about some unused imports

CONST.REPORT.CHAT_TYPE.POLICY_ADMINS,
CONST.REPORT.CHAT_TYPE.POLICY_ANNOUNCE,
CONST.REPORT.CHAT_TYPE.DOMAIN_ALL,
], lodashGet(report, ['chatType'], ''));
].indexOf(report ? report.chatType : '') > -1;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB: You could probably DRY this up a bit between here and 187.

mollfpr
mollfpr previously approved these changes Dec 8, 2022
@mollfpr
Copy link
Contributor

mollfpr commented Dec 8, 2022

Test well 👍

Just need to fix the lint.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
13398.Web.mov
13398.Web.Offline.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
13398.mWeb-Chrome.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
13398.mWeb-Safari.mov
Desktop
13398.Desktop.mov
13398.Desktop.Offline.mov
iOS
13398.iOS.mov
13398.iOS.Offline.mov
Android
13398.Android.mov
13398.Android.Offline.mov

@tgolen tgolen dismissed stale reviews from mollfpr and deetergp via 3843798 December 8, 2022 17:00
@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Dec 8, 2022

OK, this is updated to DRY up checking the report chatType and it also fixed a console warning that I caused. Please be sure to re-run all tests.

Copy link
Contributor

@mollfpr mollfpr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM and tests well! 👍

Web ✅
mWeb/Safari ✅
mWeb/Chrome ✅
Desktop ✅
iOS ✅
Android ✅

@deetergp deetergp merged commit 90e4936 into main Dec 8, 2022
@deetergp deetergp deleted the tgolen-analyze-performance-optionslist branch December 8, 2022 21:24
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Dec 8, 2022

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@mollfpr
Copy link
Contributor

mollfpr commented Dec 9, 2022

@deetergp Could you tag the BZ who assigned the final payment? Thanks!

@deetergp
Copy link
Contributor

deetergp commented Dec 9, 2022

@mollfpr I'm not sure I understand… @tgolen is one of our internal engineers and looking at the assignment history of the linked GH, it looks like it was always internal.

@mollfpr
Copy link
Contributor

mollfpr commented Dec 10, 2022

@deetergp I just following the C+ External process 😅

https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C02NK2DQWUX/p1667333777293729?thread_ts=1665685158.152769&channel=C02NK2DQWUX&message_ts=1667333777.293729

0F072D77-4354-46B9-92B9-BB033F06F969

@deetergp
Copy link
Contributor

I just following the C+ External process

Ah, I understand now, thanks!

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by @chiragsalian in version: 1.2.38-6 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Comment on lines -89 to +87
const displayNameStyle = StyleUtils.combineStyles(props.mode === CONST.OPTION_MODE.COMPACT
? [styles.optionDisplayName, ...textUnreadStyle, styles.optionDisplayNameCompact, styles.mr2]
: [styles.optionDisplayName, ...textUnreadStyle], props.style);
const alternateTextStyle = StyleUtils.combineStyles(props.mode === CONST.OPTION_MODE.COMPACT
? [textStyle, styles.optionAlternateText, styles.textLabelSupporting, styles.optionAlternateTextCompact]
: [textStyle, styles.optionAlternateText, styles.textLabelSupporting], props.style);
const contentContainerStyles = props.mode === CONST.OPTION_MODE.COMPACT
? [styles.flex1, styles.flexRow, styles.overflowHidden, styles.alignItemsCenter]
: [styles.flex1];
const sidebarInnerRowStyle = StyleSheet.flatten(props.mode === CONST.OPTION_MODE.COMPACT ? [
styles.chatLinkRowPressable,
styles.flexGrow1,
styles.optionItemAvatarNameWrapper,
styles.optionRowCompact,
styles.justifyContentCenter,
] : [
const displayNameStyle = [styles.optionDisplayName, ...textUnreadStyle, props.style];
const alternateTextStyle = [textStyle, styles.optionAlternateText, styles.textLabelSupporting, props.style];
const contentContainerStyles = [styles.flex1];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The removal of StyleUtils.combineStyles caused this #13508

(following BugZero Checklist)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants