-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2025-01-13] [GR Phase 3] Step 2 - navigation, default data, validation logic and API call to save it #50904
Comments
Hi, I'm Eugene from Callstack - expert contributor group. I’d like to work on this issue. |
Updates: Keep working on the API call for bank account creation |
Finished API integrations Working on error handling for specific cases |
Today's update: Covering edge cases, polishing the code Waiting for the data to have a successful path with API |
Today's update: Updated request with required parameters for the successful path with API |
Today's update: Added error handling for the API create bank account request Adding error handling for the get fields request |
Today's update: All updates and polishing are done - preparing the videos |
Today's update: Found the problem on the native side in case of error leads to inconsistent behavior |
Today's update: Merged main Found the root cause of the problem, changing the error handling approach for the failed API create bank account request |
Any updates here? |
Sure, current updates:
|
Today's update:
|
Today's update:
|
Waiting for API updates |
Ready for review |
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results. If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here. If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future. |
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results. If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here. If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future. |
This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. @madmax330, @hungvu193, @pasyukevich eroding to Monthly issue. P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do! |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.80-6 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2025-01-13. 🎊 For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
|
Issue is ready for payment but no BZ is assigned. @Christinadobrzyn you are the lucky winner! Please verify the payment summary looks correct and complete the checklist. Thanks! |
Payment Summary
BugZero Checklist (@Christinadobrzyn)
|
Payment summary here - #50904 (comment) @hungvu193 do we need a regression test for this? |
Regression Test:
Do we 👍 or 👎 ? |
Regression test - https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/460902 Payment summary here - #50904 (comment) I think this can be closed! @hungvu193 don't forget to request payment in ND! |
$250 approved for @hungvu193 |
Design doc section: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y4P7G9h0Easjcea7wyk52gKrNB9o1yTjpmJFYkrHDW4/edit?tab=t.0#bookmark=id.bos524lch8mt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: