Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add signBuffer function #193

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

feri42
Copy link
Contributor

@feri42 feri42 commented Dec 13, 2024

Copy the signing function from tx-signer, so that we don't need that much keychain detail knowledge in tx-signer. Looking for Conept ACK (initially).

@feri42 feri42 changed the base branch from master to @exodus/[email protected] December 13, 2024 15:31
@feri42 feri42 self-assigned this Dec 13, 2024
@feri42 feri42 requested a review from fboucquez December 13, 2024 15:32
@feri42 feri42 changed the title feat: add sign buffer function feat: add signBuffer function Dec 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@kewde kewde left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Concept ACK

@sparten11740
Copy link
Contributor

Concept ACK

@feri42
Copy link
Contributor Author

feri42 commented Jan 9, 2025

Added some tests. Good to go?

@feri42 feri42 force-pushed the f/add-sign-buffer-function branch from 0230a9e to 0596612 Compare January 9, 2025 14:10
@feri42
Copy link
Contributor Author

feri42 commented Jan 13, 2025

@sparten11740 , @diegomura good to go?

Copy link
Contributor

@sparten11740 sparten11740 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@feri42 feri42 merged commit de4ddb5 into @exodus/[email protected] Jan 13, 2025
5 checks passed
@feri42 feri42 deleted the f/add-sign-buffer-function branch January 13, 2025 13:37
feri42 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
feri42 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants