Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Derive Eq, Hash at a bunch of places #362

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 24, 2023
Merged

Conversation

ggutoski
Copy link
Contributor

@ggutoski ggutoski commented Aug 24, 2023

Description

A bunch of structs need Eq and Hash to enable integration of VID into hotshot. This PR does that. It's not pretty but it gets the job done.

This PR is a good opportunity to remind the reader that we should do a proper clean-up of trait bounds #253 to eliminate the need for PRs such as this.


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (main)
  • Linked to GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design OR have an explanation in the PR that describes this work.
  • Wrote unit tests
  • Updated relevant documentation in the code
  • Added a relevant changelog entry to the Pending section in CHANGELOG.md
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the GitHub PR explorer

@ggutoski ggutoski requested a review from mrain August 24, 2023 18:53
mrain
mrain previously approved these changes Aug 24, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@mrain mrain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.
We should fix those annoying clippy issues :(

@ggutoski ggutoski merged commit 1403e76 into main Aug 24, 2023
@ggutoski ggutoski deleted the gg/more-ugly-trait-bounds branch August 24, 2023 21:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants