-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/multiple icesheet update #185
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no foreseeable impact to ufs-model.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that the attribute for number of ice sheets should come from the cism namelist and config file not the driver one.
@@ -1694,6 +1694,18 @@ | |||
</values> | |||
</entry> | |||
|
|||
<entry id="num_icesheets"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm wondering if this needs to be here - it seems like it may be better to query the cism model to tell you the number of ice sheets?
@@ -27,11 +28,12 @@ module esmflds | |||
'ice ',& | |||
'rof ',& | |||
'wav ',& | |||
'glc '/) | |||
'glc1',& |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this a limitation that only allows up to 2 ice sheets? If so it seems like a note to that effect should be added here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#186
satisfies my issues. thanks
Description of changes
Changes to actually send 2 ice sheets from CISM
Specific notes
Verified that sending two identical ice sheets from CISM to the mediator had the mediator recognize them as separate but identical. This was with a TG compset.
Contributors other than yourself, if any:
CMEPS Issues Fixed: None
Are changes expected to change answers?
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)?
Testing performed if application target is CESM:(either UFS-S2S or CESM testing is required):
aux_cism test suite was run with nuopc with this change and was successful.
Hashes used for testing: