Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Include PRISM precipitation datm streams #219
Include PRISM precipitation datm streams #219
Changes from 1 commit
4ae7d6f
400f475
7833024
f0942b9
60a32b7
99f4dc3
0f087f5
e6676be
a6ec34f
53b75f0
0cbf0ab
d97ebc3
f6f4c22
02f3e3a
36b9b19
7c2876e
1a71713
088436d
9c0d3dc
cd96aac
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We only have a 'v1' on /glade/p/cesmdata/cseg/inputdata/atm/cdeps. However, should both of the NEON streams (NEON and NEON.PRECIP) be pulling in 'v2' or 'v3' data from the NEON side? @wwieder , this was the potential issue I was referring to in our conversation on Monday.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jedwards4b after discussing with @wwieder , it sounds like this gets overwritten to the latest version elsewhere, but should we update to 'v2'?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess if it's only being overwritten to change v1 to v2 then I would both update this to v2 AND get rid of the code that is overwriting this setting. Make sense?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to clarify, we want the feature to continue drawing from the latest version if no version is specified (e.g. some NEON sites have v3 data now!).
I get confused because the run_neon script has a feature that allows users to specify what version is being used, but the cdeps code seems hard coded to v1.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay. I agree that logically makes sense, but I'm not really sure where this actually gets updated, and I think we want to take the latest version (v3 is coming online soon/partially available for one site). For the sake of getting this PR merged and maintaining flexibility, I think it may make the most sense to add a comment to clarify this in CDEPS, and potentially tweak run_neon in the future.