-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Porting memory leak fixes from mainline repo #17
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Shameek Ganguly <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ian Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ian Chen <[email protected]>
Task linked: CU-86epcv4zv [bugfix] fix "dpxSoilGUI" memory leak |
@@ -39,23 +35,22 @@ RUN apt-get -qq update && \ | |||
wget http://packages.osrfoundation.org/gazebo.key -O - | apt-key add - && \ | |||
add-apt-repository ppa:kisak/kisak-mesa && \ | |||
curl -sSL http://get.gazebosim.org | sh && \ | |||
update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/gcc gcc /usr/bin/gcc-10 800 --slave /usr/bin/g++ g++ /usr/bin/g++-10 --slave /usr/bin/gcov gcov /usr/bin/gcov-10 && \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we already have 11th version of compiler in image
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hm... it's not linking with g++10/11, it asks -fPIC, strange... Should investigate it, but later
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
about linking: gazebosim#950
8b7930b
to
376da91
Compare
376da91
to
5f157c4
Compare
This was broken by gazebosim/gz-cmake#399, since we dropped the gazebo-specific flag, we can use native CMake mechanism for marking this library position-independent. Signed-off-by: Michael Carroll <[email protected]>
Maybe enable merge w/o squash for this repo? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks very minor but important.
Just that one question please.
Description
Porting commits related to resource deallocation from mainline
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
ran empty simulation and one project-specific simulation
---