-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 135
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RUMM-2507 Create an ApplicationLaunch view during session initialization #1160
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0eca578
RUMM-2507 Create an ApplicationLaunch view during session initialization
fuzzybinary 727fd54
RUMM-2507 Add CHANGELOG item
fuzzybinary 34cfc1e
Fix build issue
fuzzybinary add1dae
RUMM-2507 Fix Integration Tests
fuzzybinary 40e29cf
RUMM-2507 Switch to using RUMStartApplicationCommand
fuzzybinary 0fbf63d
Update Sources/Datadog/RUM/RUMMonitor/Scopes/RUMViewScope.swift
fuzzybinary a75a83c
Fix test compilation
fuzzybinary f1fd808
Minor language / signature change.
fuzzybinary 125b1f6
RUMM-2507 Fix tests from launch timing change
fuzzybinary 1ab7b2e
RUMM-2507 Fix application start time logic for SwiftUI
fuzzybinary dc406a4
RUMM-2507 Fix crash tests to look for applicaiton start on Applicatio…
fuzzybinary File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It rather seems we're starting initial session (along with the
ApplicationLaunch
view) on first command received byRUMApplicationScope
. It looks different than what we say in PR description (and what we want):No? If that is true, it would make more sense to just send the new command right after application scope init, somewhere here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I think I get it - we always do it (start the AL view), it is just that we await for any other command to do it. Makes sense - if the app starts idle and nothing happens, no session will be started 👍.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That was my thought yes. It also made things a little bit cleaner as I could just use the context / writer as part of the command I was already recieving.