-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable datadog_otel_components_ocb_build #34348
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Gitlab CI Configuration ChangesAdded Jobsdatadog_otel_components_ocb_builddatadog_otel_components_ocb_build:
artifacts:
paths:
- ocb-output.log
- otelcol-custom.log
- flare-info.log
when: always
before_script:
- mkdir -p $GOPATH/pkg/mod/cache && tar xJf modcache.tar.xz -C $GOPATH/pkg/mod/cache
|| exit 101
- rm -f modcache.tar.xz
image: registry.ddbuild.io/ci/datadog-agent-buildimages/deb_x64$DATADOG_AGENT_BUILDIMAGES_SUFFIX:$DATADOG_AGENT_BUILDIMAGES
needs:
- go_deps
rules:
- if: $CI_PIPELINE_SOURCE =~ /^schedule.*$/
when: never
- if: $CI_COMMIT_MESSAGE =~ /.*\[skip cancel\].*/
when: never
- if: $CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME =~ /.*-skip-cancel$/
when: never
- when: always
script:
- echo "Building custom collector with datadog components"
- test/otel/testdata/ocb_build_script.sh
- echo "see artifacts for job logs"
stage: integration_test
tags:
- arch:amd64
timeout: 15 minutes Changes Summary
ℹ️ Diff available in the job log. |
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=56721038 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit 4aacaea |
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision✅ Passed |
Static quality checks ✅Please find below the results from static quality gates Successful checksInfo
|
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: dc5fc42 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.12 | [+0.06, +0.18] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.06 | [-0.72, +0.85] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.79, +0.83] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.70, +0.74] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.68, +0.69] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.03, +0.03] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.81, +0.81] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.29, +0.27] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.64, +0.62] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.06 | [-0.97, +0.85] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | -0.07 | [-0.54, +0.39] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.18 | [-0.24, -0.11] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -0.27 | [-3.26, +2.71] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.38 | [-0.45, -0.32] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | -0.47 | [-0.51, -0.44] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.54 | [-1.31, +0.24] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
# 2. Compatibility Issue: | ||
# - opentelemetry-collector-contrib fails to compile due to recent changes in the Datadog Agent. | ||
# - The pkgconfigmodel package was renamed to viperconfig, breaking compatibility with the latest updates. | ||
echo "- github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/exporter/datadogexporter => github.com/ogaca-dd/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/exporter/datadogexporter v0.0.0-20250220150909-786462df4eca" >> /tmp/otel-ci/builder-config.yaml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the idea that this would be removed after the next contrib release?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib#38165 may unblock this
What does this PR do?
This PR enables
datadog_otel_components_ocb_build
which was temporary disabled hereMotivation
Describe how you validated your changes
Run unit tests.
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes