-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(ssi): remove newly added config variables #33803
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This commit cleans up naming and other misc changes that were not addressed in my last PR given the size of the change.
This commit removes the newly added config variables that were added. We've decided that we no longer wish to expose this option to the user and that it's not strictly necessary.
# | ||
# Each section note must be formatted as reStructuredText. | ||
--- | ||
upgrade: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@davidor Just to confirm, there is no expected change as a result of this change series?
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 9751798 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +1.73 | [+1.66, +1.81] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.15 | [+0.07, +0.22] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.28, +0.28] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.02, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.87, +0.84] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.67, +0.62] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.03 | [-0.81, +0.76] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.04 | [-0.11, +0.02] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | -0.05 | [-0.98, +0.89] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.05 | [-0.77, +0.67] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | -0.09 | [-0.99, +0.82] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | -0.33 | [-0.80, +0.13] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | -0.44 | [-0.48, -0.39] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -0.59 | [-3.64, +2.46] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.75 | [-1.55, +0.05] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -2.43 | [-3.30, -1.56] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
What does this PR do?
This change removes the webhook specific config values for enabled/disabled namespaces and cleans up some variable names missed during a refactor. Along with #33599, this should maintain the current released agent expectations that the
config
andtagsfromlabels
webhook will execute in the following conditions:admission_controller.mutate_unlabelled
is set totrue
Motivation
We added these config variables in fix(ssi): decouple admission controller webhooks as part of Decoupling Admission Controller Webhooks. After more consideration, we decided that we don't actually want to support these and don't believe they are actually necessary unless a user was abusing
apm_config.instrumentation.disabled_namespaces
which feels unlikely.Describe how you validated your changes
I ensured injection still worked as expected with the following helm config:
I ensured the following config with APM disabled would still apply
config
andtagstolabels
:Finally, I ensured that no mutations occurred with
mutateUnlablled
andapm.instrumentation.enabled
set to false.Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
See Decoupling Admission Controller Webhooks
Additional Notes
We have a meeting scheduled for February 18th to finalize this decision with the group once everyone is back from vacation, but it feels safer to have these options removed for now.