Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: More robust connect cmesh faces by vertices and sphere cmesh examples #1296

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

jmark
Copy link
Collaborator

@jmark jmark commented Nov 6, 2024

Describe your changes here:

This PR introduces fixes/enhancements to make the join_by_vertices routine more robust regarding the value range of the input vertices. Besides that this PR makes the sphere cmesh examples more robust by applying the actual radius parameter at the end when the vertex information is stored in the cmesh object. For some use cases the radius gets extremely big, e.g. around 1e6, and the shell thickness, quite small, e.g. around 10. This might confuse the join_by_vertices routine. The fix is to determine the face connectivity on a reference sphere/shell with sane radius/thickness.

All these boxes must be checked by the reviewers before merging the pull request:

As a reviewer please read through all the code lines and make sure that the code is fully understood, bug free, well-documented and well-structured.

General

  • The reviewer executed the new code features at least once and checked the results manually

  • The code follows the t8code coding guidelines

  • New source/header files are properly added to the Makefiles

  • The code is well documented

  • All function declarations, structs/classes and their members have a proper doxygen documentation

  • All new algorithms and data structures are sufficiently optimal in terms of memory and runtime (If this should be merged, but there is still potential for optimization, create a new issue)

Tests

  • The code is covered in an existing or new test case using Google Test

Github action

  • The code compiles without warning in debugging and release mode, with and without MPI (this should be executed automatically in a github action)

  • All tests pass (in various configurations, this should be executed automatically in a github action)

    If the Pull request introduces code that is not covered by the github action (for example coupling with a new library):

    • Should this use case be added to the github action?
    • If not, does the specific use case compile and all tests pass (check manually)

Scripts and Wiki

  • If a new directory with source-files is added, it must be covered by the script/find_all_source_files.scp to check the indentation of these files.
  • If this PR introduces a new feature, it must be covered in an example/tutorial and a Wiki article.

License

  • The author added a BSD statement to doc/ (or already has one)

@jmark jmark added enhancement Enhances already existing code shouldn't take long Can be resolved in under 30 mins fix priority: medium Should be solved within half a year workload: low Would take half a day or less labels Nov 6, 2024
@jmark
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jmark commented Nov 18, 2024

@Niklas997
@Davknapp

Do you need any input in order to progress on the review? Please agree on who feels responsible for doing the review.

@Davknapp Davknapp assigned Davknapp and unassigned Davknapp and Niklas997 Nov 18, 2024
@Davknapp
Copy link
Collaborator

@Niklas997 @Davknapp

Do you need any input in order to progress on the review? Please agree on who feels responsible for doing the review.

I will do it

Copy link
Collaborator

@Davknapp Davknapp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some small changes, then we can merge.

@Davknapp Davknapp assigned jmark and unassigned Davknapp Nov 19, 2024
@jmark
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jmark commented Nov 19, 2024

Some small changes, then we can merge.

I like it! Done.

@jmark jmark assigned Davknapp and unassigned jmark Nov 19, 2024
@Davknapp Davknapp merged commit 0d5740c into main Nov 19, 2024
20 checks passed
@Davknapp Davknapp deleted the fix-dedimensionalize-sphere-mesh-examples branch November 19, 2024 14:24
@jmark jmark mentioned this pull request Nov 28, 2024
14 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Enhances already existing code fix priority: medium Should be solved within half a year shouldn't take long Can be resolved in under 30 mins workload: low Would take half a day or less
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants