-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add tool Dyana
#3
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
add tool Dyana
#3
Conversation
Thanks for the PR. The tool has a |
perfect, thank you @stevespringett and done! (here 2f4bf84) hope this works and plmk if you need anything else, thank you! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please do not mix scopes.
just add your tool at the bottom, and revert all the whitespace changes and format modifications.
Thanks.
PS: if you think the whitespace changes are beneficial, open another PR for this scope.
Signed-off-by: Ads Dawson <104169244+GangGreenTemperTatum@users.noreply.github.com>
apologies @jkowalleck , my bad on a linter - fixed and thank you |
could you help me understand how this tool is connected to CycloneDX? |
sure and thanks! reasoning TLDR;
therefore, this is a swiss-army knife to anyone involved within an SDLC or security team etc that allows them to verify the legitimacy, integrity and system resource requirements for these pieces of software.. plmk if you need anything else and hope that helps! |
Could you help me understand, hat does the tool have to do with CycloneDX? |
Dyana
i'm sorry @jkowalleck , i'm not sure if its a duplicate comment but i do not understand your question and understand i've addressed that here(?) please let me know if this is not the case |
I mean, you want the tool to be listed on the website of CycloneDX, on the marketplace for tools that are somehow connected to CycloneDX, right? How is Does |
sorry @jkowalleck i see now, this makes sense with me - is either of the two a hard-requirement for the tool-centre?
we can certainly look into a feature capability to do this - do you have any developer doc references at all? (apologies if this is an obvious question) |
@GangGreenTemperTatum this looks like a really interesting tool. Thanks for making us aware of it. I looked at the repo and Dyana doesn't seem to support CycloneDX today. I think there is some potential to support it, specifically support for formulation (Manufacturing Bill of Materials - MBOM) and for ML-BOM. We have an Authoritative Guide to MBOM being developed now and a ML-BOM guide later this year. In the meantime, the CycloneDX specification can be found here. |
thanks @stevespringett ! added a NFR in our repo dreadnode/dyana#38 and i'll certainly look into this on the backlog 👍 |
hey @stevespringett @jkowalleck , i created an issue in the CISA repo here aibom-squad/rsa-2024#3 as per here, we are unsure how the
as of today, current capabilities of
TLDR; question for you, is this a hard requirement for the MLBOM format? TYIA! |
Dyana provides a safe, easily adoptable and approachable methodology for any developers or engineers to verify numerous elements of their supply-chain from multiple model formats, programming language dependencies and even down to executable files.
I strongly believe this tool is a great open-source contribution that can be adopted by the OWASP foundation in general due to its multi-faceted use-cases and lightweight, flexible approach and serves multiple use-cases - including, but not limited to:
Related links:
https://pypi.org/project/dyana/0.0.2/
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dreadnode_meet-dyana-a-new-open-source-tool-from-dreadnode-activity-7284984127064260608-aLS-?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop
OWASP/www-project-top-10-for-large-language-model-applications#531