testing(lib/trie): change lib/trie slow and intensive benchmark-oriented tests to benchmarks

[qdm12]

Changes

• Why?
  • This must be slowing down the CI quite badly
  • This makes my CPU melt when running them and forgetting to t.Skip() them
  • These are really benchmarks, and not unit testing anything really as far as i know
• Change unit tests to a merged Go benchmark (you can run them with go test -bench)
• Use deepcopy to copy the trie instead of re-generating one, which takes time
• Use math/rand instead of crypto/rand to generate trie values faster. I don't think we care about crypto secured randomness in most unit tests, and especially not in a benchmark

Tests

go test -bench -run ^Benchmark_Trie_Hash$ github.com/ChainSafe/gossamer/lib/trie

Issues

Primary Reviewer

• @arijitAD

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2031 (0ac0fd5) into development (0bc4bf1) will increase coverage by 0.16%.
The diff coverage is 61.20%.

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           development    #2031      +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage        59.94%   60.10%   +0.16%     
===============================================
  Files              185      193       +8     
  Lines            26343    26525     +182     
===============================================
+ Hits             15790    15942     +152     
- Misses            8677     8699      +22     
- Partials          1876     1884       +8     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit-tests	60.10% <61.20%> (+0.16%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
cmd/gossamer/profile.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
cmd/gossamer/toml_config.go	27.27% <0.00%> (ø)
dot/config.go	26.76% <0.00%> (-1.46%)	⬇️
dot/network/message.go	69.26% <0.00%> (-2.49%)	⬇️
dot/network/sync.go	5.26% <0.00%> (ø)
dot/network/utils.go	57.89% <0.00%> (ø)
dot/rpc/subscription/listeners.go	71.92% <0.00%> (ø)
dot/state/block.go	43.52% <0.00%> (-0.11%)	⬇️
dot/state/bloom.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
dot/state/offline_pruner.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 93 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update dde989d...0ac0fd5. Read the comment docs.

[noot]

is there a unit test for the parallel trie hashing? we should keep a unit test for it somewhere, but this change is fine

[qdm12]

is there a unit test for the parallel trie hashing? we should keep a unit test for it somewhere, but this change is fine

I'll add one in #2009 since I changed/improved the implementation for the parallel hashing.

[github-actions]

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.6.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀