Add ability to init the wallet with a predefined allowed origin

[Tbaut]

closes #433

This allows to reduce a lot of the clicks to connect etc if not needed. Users once they've allowed a website to access their accounts will not have to authorize the connection every single time. This is what this feature enables.

The visitWithLocalStorage function which was used all over, now must have a new name. Please suggest anything better if you think visitCustom isn't great. The reason why I had to bloat it, is because the extension and the accounts need to be loaded in the window object before the page loads, which is also when we set the custom localStorage elements 🤷‍♂️

[asnaith]

The visitWithLocalStorage function which was used all over, now must have a new name. Please suggest anything better if you think visitCustom isn't great.

As the setup is done before the visit perhaps we could name it this way around?

• setupAndVisit
• configureAndVisit
• injectConfigAndVisit (I like this one but it's long 😅)

[Tbaut]

That failing test is annoying. I can reproduce locally, and it sounds like it's actually a bug, but it's not happening in prod,

[Lykhoyda]

The visitWithLocalStorage function which was used all over, now must have a new name. Please suggest anything better if you think visitCustom isn't great.

As the setup is done before the visit perhaps we could name it this way around?

• setupAndVisit
• configureAndVisit
• injectConfigAndVisit (I like this one but it's long 😅)

Agree, we need to come up with a better name for visitCustom method. Maybe visitWithConfig or something else

[asnaith]

setupAndVisit it is :)

Looks good to go

[Tbaut]

ah I wrote a comment the other day, at least I thought, but didn't click and commit. I went for setupAndVisit because "inject" felt weird to me to talk about localStorage. Also, keeping it generic lets us add many other things in the future, hopefully without renaming.

now weirdly the test that used to fail is passing... 🙄 if it proves annoying in the future I'll just take another look at it, but it sounded a little like an annoying edge case specific to the test.

[Tbaut]

I just had to name it for it to fail. I'll take a look then, before merging.