Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated tutorial to cover new method of building datastores #497

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

charles-turner-1
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@charles-turner-1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I don't think this PR addresses #480 yet, but I think we could add that in straightforwardly whilst we're working on the same notebook?

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Collaborator

I don't think we want to change this until we are directing folks to use xp65 project instead of hh5 ?

@charles-turner-1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Good question, I don't know - I thought hh5 had already been retired?

But yeah, agreed that changing things too early is not ideal.

@@ -13,7 +13,10 @@
"\n",
Copy link
Collaborator

@navidcy navidcy Feb 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we still need "The old way"?

If "the old way" is not suggested anymore let's drop it?


Reply via ReviewNB

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The old method gives people a little more control over the datastore building process, so I think it's worth keeping around. I've reworded things to make that clearer though.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@charles-turner-1 charles-turner-1 Feb 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming this - Great! Let's not call it "Old" and "New" then? Can we give a more descriptive name? comment got into the wrong thread - the changes should be here.

Let me know if you think this clarifies?

@@ -13,7 +13,10 @@
"\n",
Copy link
Collaborator

@navidcy navidcy Feb 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why the font size here is huge?


Reply via ReviewNB

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like a misformatted code block in a markdown cell, just pushed what should be a fix

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup, fixed.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great! Let's not call it "Old" and "New" then? Can we give a more descriptive name?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants