Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

musig-spec: add Session Context to simplify sign/verify/sigagg #171

Closed

Conversation

jonasnick
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

We will need more of these explanations and it's better if they do not interfere
the specification section.

Also need to create new notation section because the definitions contained therein
are used by the explanation.
Copy link
Contributor

@robot-dreams robot-dreams left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one nit, otherwise looks good.

See discussion in #167 (review) for previous context. I also pushed #166 (I'll try to keep the branch in sync with spec updates).

doc/musig-spec.mediawiki Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jonasnick jonasnick force-pushed the musig-spec-session branch from 371c78c to 5576a9e Compare March 8, 2022 17:57
Besides reducing the number of arguments, this also removes the R argument from
PartialSigAgg which was not defined precisely:
* The final nonce ''R'' as created during  ''Sign'' or ''PartialSigVerify'': a point

Moreover, this paves the way for adding the tweaking, which requires
PartialSigAgg to also have access to challenge e and can now be easily computed
from the Session Context.
@robot-dreams
Copy link
Contributor

ACK 5576a9e

@jonasnick
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this because discussions on #167 also affect commits in this PR, so better to focus on #167.

@jonasnick jonasnick closed this Mar 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants