Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for AECDeltas-compliant SpeckleCore and SpeckleServer #72

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

alelom
Copy link
Member

@alelom alelom commented Mar 20, 2020

Issues addressed by this PR

Closes #

Test files

Changelog

Additional comments

@alelom alelom changed the title #714 diffing o m terminology Align to changes to oM and Engine terminology; add support for AECDeltas-compliant SpeckleCore and SpeckleServer Mar 20, 2020
@alelom alelom requested a review from izzylys March 20, 2020 16:58
@alelom alelom self-assigned this Mar 20, 2020
@alelom alelom added the status:WIP PR in progress and still in draft, not ready for formal review label Mar 20, 2020
@alelom
Copy link
Member Author

alelom commented Mar 20, 2020

@izzylys consider that I'm referencing a local copy of SpeckleCore here, coming from this branch: https://github.com/speckleworks/SpeckleCore/tree/paul/diffing

Also the Push might be a bit broken because of the tests I was doing. Let me know if you have any trouble in doing what you need to do.

@alelom alelom changed the title Align to changes to oM and Engine terminology; add support for AECDeltas-compliant SpeckleCore and SpeckleServer Add support for AECDeltas-compliant SpeckleCore and SpeckleServer Apr 28, 2020
@FraserGreenroyd
Copy link
Contributor

Discussed with @alelom today concluded this PR can be closed in favour of more recent work in this sector.

@FraserGreenroyd FraserGreenroyd deleted the #714-Diffing_oM-Terminology branch December 14, 2022 10:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status:WIP PR in progress and still in draft, not ready for formal review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants