Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CODEOWNERS file removed #1171

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2022
Merged

Conversation

pawelbaran
Copy link
Member

Issues addressed by this PR

Closes #1170

Test files

Not affecting the code.

Changelog

Additional comments

@pawelbaran pawelbaran added the type:compliance Non-conforming to code guidelines label Jan 31, 2022
@pawelbaran pawelbaran self-assigned this Jan 31, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@FraserGreenroyd FraserGreenroyd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does as it says on the tin. Lovely jubbly.

@pawelbaran
Copy link
Member Author

@BHoMBot check required

@bhombot-ci
Copy link

bhombot-ci bot commented Jan 31, 2022

@pawelbaran to confirm, the following checks are now queued:

  • code-compliance
  • documentation-compliance
  • project-compliance
  • core
  • null-handling
  • serialisation
  • versioning
  • installer

@pawelbaran
Copy link
Member Author

@BHoMBot check copyright-compliance
@BHoMBot check dataset-compliance
@BHoMBot check ready-to-merge

@bhombot-ci
Copy link

bhombot-ci bot commented Jan 31, 2022

@pawelbaran to confirm, the following checks are now queued:

  • copyright-compliance
  • dataset-compliance
  • ready-to-merge

There are 18 requests in the queue ahead of you.

@bhombot-ci
Copy link

bhombot-ci bot commented Jan 31, 2022

FAO: @FraserGreenroyd
@pawelbaran is seeking dispensation on this Pull Request to skip a required check. Please can you provide authorisation for the check to be skipped, or provide assistance as appropriate.

The check they wish to have dispensation on is ready-to-merge.

If you are providing dispensation on this occasion, please reply with:

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 5004761878

@bhombot-ci
Copy link

bhombot-ci bot commented Jan 31, 2022

FAO: @FraserGreenroyd
@FraserGreenroyd is seeking dispensation on this Pull Request to skip a required check. Please can you provide authorisation for the check to be skipped, or provide assistance as appropriate.

The check they wish to have dispensation on is ready-to-merge.

If you are providing dispensation on this occasion, please reply with:

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 5004761878

@FraserGreenroyd
Copy link
Contributor

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 5004761878

@bhombot-ci
Copy link

bhombot-ci bot commented Jan 31, 2022

@FraserGreenroyd I have now provided a passing check on reference 5004761878 as requested.

@pawelbaran pawelbaran merged commit f640664 into main Jan 31, 2022
@pawelbaran pawelbaran deleted the Revit_Toolkit-#1170-RemoveCodeOwners branch January 31, 2022 11:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:compliance Non-conforming to code guidelines
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove codeowners file
2 participants