Geometry_Engine: Correctly pass tolerance for LineIntersection methods

[IsakNaslundBh]

Issues addressed by this PR

Closes #2902

Fixes tolerances being correctly passed to method doing actual work in line intersections.

Test files

https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/:f:/s/BHoM/EuTzNW600kpFglxk53P9rlEBW6FsOhhmEEgKMHqCnCCLeQ?e=hhoZ9M

Changelog

Additional comments

Changed the name of the file from LineIntersections to LineIntersection (removing the plural s) as the code compliance accepts a trailing s on the method relative to the file name, but does not accept it the other way around.

[IsakNaslundBh]

@BHoMBot check compliance

[bhombot-ci]

@IsakNaslundBh to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check code-compliance
• check documentation-compliance
• check project-compliance
• check branch-compliance
• check dataset-compliance
• check copyright-compliance

[IsakNaslundBh]

@BHoMBot check code-compliance

[bhombot-ci]

@IsakNaslundBh to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check code-compliance

[IsakNaslundBh]

@BHoMBot check compliance

[bhombot-ci]

@IsakNaslundBh to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check code-compliance
• check documentation-compliance
• check project-compliance
• check branch-compliance
• check dataset-compliance
• check copyright-compliance

[bhombot-ci]

The check code-compliance has already been run previously and recorded as a successful check. This check has not been run again at this time.

[IsakNaslundBh]

@BHoMBot check required

[bhombot-ci]

@IsakNaslundBh to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check code-compliance
• check documentation-compliance
• check project-compliance
• check core
• check null-handling
• check serialisation
• check versioning
• check installer

There are 5 requests in the queue ahead of you.

[bhombot-ci]

The check code-compliance has already been run previously and recorded as a successful check. This check has not been run again at this time.

[bhombot-ci]

The check documentation-compliance has already been run previously and recorded as a successful check. This check has not been run again at this time.

[IsakNaslundBh]

@BHoMBot check unit-tests

[bhombot-ci]

@IsakNaslundBh to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check unit-tests

There are 18 requests in the queue ahead of you.

[IsakNaslundBh]

@BHoMBot check required

[bhombot-ci]

@IsakNaslundBh to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check code-compliance
• check documentation-compliance
• check project-compliance
• check core
• check null-handling
• check serialisation
• check versioning
• check installer

There are 1 requests in the queue ahead of you.

[pawelbaran]

Happy about the changes (clear improvement), but as discussed with @IsakNaslundBh offline, the whole concept of line infinity looks pretty overcooked now, possibly we could get rid of useInfiniteLine argument and simply drive the queries by Line.Infinite? Of course not for this PR, more of a general thought.

[IsakNaslundBh]

@BHoMBot check copyright-compliance
@BHoMBot check dataset-compliance
@BHoMBot check unit-tests
@BHoMBot check ready-to-merge

[bhombot-ci]

@IsakNaslundBh to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check copyright-compliance
• check dataset-compliance
• check unit-tests
• check ready-to-merge

There are 41 requests in the queue ahead of you.

[FraserGreenroyd]

@IsakNaslundBh could we consider adding some Unit Tests for this in the future (happy for it to be a new issue if desired)?

[IsakNaslundBh]

@IsakNaslundBh could we consider adding some Unit Tests for this in the future (happy for it to be a new issue if desired)?

Yes, we can. Will handle spearately. Issue raised here #2904