Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[KeyVault] Add abortSignal as an optional property to all of the relevant interfaces #4357

Closed
sadasant opened this issue Jul 19, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4383
Closed
Assignees
Labels
Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. KeyVault

Comments

@sadasant
Copy link
Contributor

Even though we support abortSignal, it needs to be explicitly defined in the API to compiler properly. See: https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-js/pull/4343/files#diff-91e6187853dc6c6c676058faaa81d8e2R7

@sadasant sadasant added Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. KeyVault labels Jul 19, 2019
@sadasant sadasant self-assigned this Jul 19, 2019
sadasant added a commit to sadasant/azure-sdk-for-js that referenced this issue Jul 22, 2019
…ecrets

With these changes, our current API fully supports cancelling a request
before we get a response. The idea is that this feature is already
supported by the core dependencies we use, and by passing this property
through, we'll get the benefits right away without having to do other
changes.

keyvault-keys and keyvault-secrets currently have a unit test that
proves that this works for one of the functions that shares this
underlying APIs. This PR adds the support to the other similar methods.
We could also add other tests demonstrating this behavior for these
other functions.

Fixes Azure#4357
sadasant added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 23, 2019
…ecrets (#4383)

With these changes, our current API fully supports cancelling a request
before we get a response. The idea is that this feature is already
supported by the core dependencies we use, and by passing this property
through, we'll get the benefits right away without having to do other
changes.

keyvault-keys and keyvault-secrets currently have a unit test that
proves that this works for one of the functions that shares this
underlying APIs. This PR adds the support to the other similar methods.
We could also add other tests demonstrating this behavior for these
other functions.

Fixes #4357
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 12, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. KeyVault
Projects
None yet
1 participant