Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 28, 2022. It is now read-only.

adding codegen annotation for rbac, shotname and columns #32

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2019

Conversation

xinsnake
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@xtellurian
Copy link
Contributor

just gonna force merge this one

@xtellurian xtellurian merged commit d34a29a into Azure:feat/pure-go Jun 21, 2019
@xinsnake xinsnake deleted the fix/codegen-annotation branch June 21, 2019 06:07
Azadehkhojandi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2019
* Rewrite the operator to use go directly to communicate with Databricks (#19)

* remove swagger

* migrate to go mod

* better submit logic

* move operator out

* clean up rbac

* organise codebase

* use local kustomize and extend tests

* fix delete error when job does not exist

* adding tests for notebookspec

* adding secret testing, add logging

* adding sleep to allow more stable tests

* add extra column and state

* added shortnames (nbj)

* rename to azure pipelines

delete path filter in pipeline yaml

* adding codegen annotation for rbac, shotname and columns (#32)

* always requeue the reconciler (#33)

* add databricks host and token to test env

* fix delete data inconsistency and improved status struct

* updated timeout to 60 seconds

* disable install kustomize step

* adding binary in lfs

* checkout lfs in build

* update readme

* bump databricks sdk to remove manual deepcopy code

* cherry pick readme change

* Feat/readme (#38)

* update readme

* upgrade kubebuilder version 

* re-apply a few changes

* adding tests for types

* test not really working but it's in there

* fix context and describe field

* all tests pass

* adding readme and pipeline

* adding docs image

* make pipeline work with gomodule

* try with installation of kubebuilder and kustomize

* forgot to set permission

* adding deep equal test to only update status when changed

* fix old group name to now be databricks
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants