feat: Implement StudioCodeListEditor in component edit view

[ErlingHauan]

Description

• Implemented the StudioCodeListEditor component in the "manual" tab. Use &featureFlags=codeListEditor to enable it.
• Added a custom hook that returns an object with the text keys for StudioCodeListEditor.
• Added another custom hook that controls the button value in the manual tab.
• Removed superflous spacing below the options tabs.
• Reused existing language resources that are not likely to change, and deleted the duplicates.
• Moved an alert inside the component in the manual tab, since it's only displayed there.

Edit:

• Made the new modal a fixed size.

Related Issue(s)

• Implement StudioCodelistEditor in component edit view #13505

Video

Spiller.inn.2024-10-30.155233.mp4

Edit: The modal now has a fixed height.

Verification

• Your code builds clean without any errors or warnings
• Manual testing done (required)
• Relevant automated test added (if you find this hard, leave it and we'll help out)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.28302% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 95.20%. Comparing base (4c57f46) to head (f00e7d5).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ig/editModal/EditOptions/OptionTabs/OptionTabs.tsx	89.65%	1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...OptionTabs/EditManualOptions/EditManualOptions.tsx	92.85%	0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #13922      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.20%   95.20%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1740     1747       +7     
  Lines       22828    22876      +48     
  Branches     2672     2676       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        21733    21778      +45     
- Misses        849      850       +1     
- Partials      246      248       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[TomasEng]

Dette er veldig bra. EditOptions begynner å bli ganske stor og kompleks. Hva tenker du om å benytte anledningen til å rydde opp der?

Ellers lurer jeg på om det er nødvendig å bruke debounce her. Det er mulig jeg tar feil, men så vidt jeg vet er dette allerede satt opp på et høyere nivå, og da bør det være tilstrekkelig. Hvis det likevel er nødvendig, ville jeg satt opp Timer Mocks i testene for å unngå at de bare står og venter.

Ellers må du gjerne gå over funksjonene du har laget og sette på returtyper. Dette er en regel vi egentlig burde hatt linting på, men vi har ikke satt det opp fordi det er så mye gammel kode som ikke følger regelen.

[Ildest]

Reviewed texts with a couple of suggestions

[standeren]

Tested OK! 🚀

[Ildest]

All good