S1.10.scousepy #79
Merged
S1.10.scousepy #79
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
sneaky broad comp....
something weird has happened here....with scouse....not your fitting
sneaky broad.... and again, note that higher v comps can't be fit without introducing the broad comp so abandoning those
|
|
Hey Jonny, I looked at the spectra. The new ones definitely look better! Especially thanks for catching these sneaky broad ones! I think we can merge this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Refitting completed. #11
Spectra look good.
Some spectra with negatives on either side of strong emission peaks (3, 55, 65, 66, 74-78, 116, 117, 136-141)
Two spectra required a comparatively high SNR (142, SNR=22; 152, SNR=19).
I can provide screenshots of the above mentioned spectra if necessary, but there was nothing really unusal/weird/surprising.