Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add gateway ccvs - 4.3 #6485

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2020
Merged

add gateway ccvs - 4.3 #6485

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2020

Conversation

lazedo
Copy link
Member

@lazedo lazedo commented Apr 20, 2020

  • these were already allowed in the schema but were not sent

@lazedo lazedo force-pushed the stepswitch-resources-ccvs-4.3 branch 2 times, most recently from 58a2b9f to f78dfa7 Compare April 20, 2020 13:39
@lazedo lazedo changed the title add gateway ccvs add gateway ccvs - 4.3 Apr 20, 2020
@lazedo lazedo force-pushed the stepswitch-resources-ccvs-4.3 branch from f78dfa7 to 53a659a Compare April 20, 2020 15:20
@lazedo
add gateway ccvs
7a3cfa7 
* these were already allowed in the schema but were not sent
@lazedo lazedo force-pushed the stepswitch-resources-ccvs-4.3 branch from 53a659a to 7a3cfa7 Compare April 20, 2020 15:26
@lazedo lazedo marked this pull request as ready for review April 20, 2020 16:47
harenson
harenson approved these changes Apr 22, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@harenson harenson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@harenson harenson merged commit 8807437 into 4.3 Apr 22, 2020
@harenson harenson deleted the stepswitch-resources-ccvs-4.3 branch April 22, 2020 19:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@harenson harenson harenson approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@lazedo @harenson