Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove PLP backwards-compatibility #85

Conversation

moodlezoup
Copy link
Contributor

Description

All PLPs are now using the new interface. Removes backwards compatibility from MixinZeroExBridge and LiquidityProviderSandbox. This also fixes the issue of LiquidityProviderSandbox swallowing errors.

Testing instructions

Types of changes

Checklist:

  • Prefix PR title with [WIP] if necessary.
  • Add tests to cover changes as needed.
  • Update documentation as needed.
  • Add new entries to the relevant CHANGELOG.jsons.

Copy link
Contributor

@hysz hysz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@dorothy-zbornak dorothy-zbornak merged commit cef2696 into fix/ep-december-2020-audit-feedback-1 Dec 16, 2020
@dorothy-zbornak dorothy-zbornak deleted the feat/remove-plp-backwards-compatibility branch December 16, 2020 06:37
dorothy-zbornak added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2020
* `@0x/contracts-zero-ex`: Address audit feedback (1/2)

* `@0x/contracts-zero-ex`: Cap the ETH transfer amount to a liquidity provider to `msg.value`

* `@0x/contracts-zero-ex`: Bump feature contract versions

* `@0x/contracts-zero-ex`: Always transfer msg.value to the liqudity provider in LiquiidityProviderFeature

* Remove PLP backwards-compatibility (#85)

* Remove backwards-compatibility from MixinZeroExBridge and LiquidityProviderSandbox

* `@0x/contracts-zero-ex`: Update CHANGELOG

Co-authored-by: Lawrence Forman <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Lawrence Forman <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: mzhu25 <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants