feat (docs): Add SambaNova community provider #5281
Conversation
| ```bash | ||
| # With npm | ||
| npm install sambanova-ai-provider | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| # With yarn | ||
| yarn add sambanova-ai-provider | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| # With pnpm | ||
| pnpm add sambanova-ai-provider | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use switcher (see other community providers eg ollama)
|
|
||
| ### Example | ||
|
|
||
| ```js |
|
|
||
| const model = sambanovaProvider('Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct'); | ||
|
|
||
| await generateText({ |
|
|
||
| Basic demonstration of text generation using the SambaNova provider. | ||
|
|
||
| ```js |
|
|
||
| | Chat completion | Image input | | ||
| | ------------------ | ------------------ | | ||
| | :white_check_mark: | :white_check_mark: | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
unclear if supported, please use <Check size={18} />
| @@ -0,0 +1,178 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
| title: SambaNova | |||
| description: Learn how to use SambaNova provider for the AI SDK. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
...to use the SambaNova provider...
|
@lgrammel fixed comments. Also I want to remark my question: as this is going to be the official SambaNova provider, is it correct to have it under community providers and not under the official ones? What's the difference? Can we aim to be official? |
- The repo is internal for now
|
There is no such provider on npm? https://www.npmjs.com/package/sambanova-ai-provider gives a 404 |
|
@lgrammel Hey! It's already up, you can find it here: https://www.npmjs.com/package/sambanova-ai-provider. Let me know any comments, thanks. |
lgrammel
changed the title
As it was suggested at #5122, I want to add SambaNova as a custom third party provider.
We're currently missing the NPM package and official repository link as we're currently working to publish it, but if we can get reviewed to know that everything's working fine would be great.
I was wondering if this is the correct approach, and not the approach of an individual that wants to create an unofficial provider, because I noticed that there are two types of providers: "official" ones being handled at
content/providers/01-ai-sdk-providersand community ones being handled atcontent/providers/03-community-providers.And we want our company to have an official integration/provider with this repo, so that's why I'm asking this.
Thanks.
cc. @lgrammel