-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 987
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docs: Improve Accessors and Manager contracts documentation #507
Conversation
b49fd97
to
becf156
Compare
"prettier": "^2.8.3", | ||
"prettier-plugin-solidity": "1.1.1", | ||
"prettier": "^2.8.4", | ||
"prettier-plugin-solidity": "1.1.2", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
keeping the formatters up-to-date in case there are any improvements for docs n code formatting
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4193190861
💛 - Coveralls |
8828a42
to
0e1a44f
Compare
/// @author Richard Meissner - <[email protected]> | ||
/** | ||
* @title Simulate Transaction Accessor. | ||
* @notice Can be used with StorageAccessible to simulate Safe transactions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should this be @dev?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had an internal debate on this one. I reasoned that the end user of this particular contract is a developer, so notice
is the way to go. Also, the docs mention that @dev
is for extra details
and we have none
contracts/base/ModuleManager.sol
Outdated
/// @param data Data payload of module transaction. | ||
/// @param operation Operation type of module transaction. | ||
/** | ||
* @notice Execute `operation` (0: Call, 1: DelegateCall) to `to` with `data` and `value` (Native Token) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we have the full data in here? might be quite long ... but not sure what a good alternative would be. At least I would exchange value and data in the text to avoid that the value gets lost after a long data.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
removed data
0e1a44f
to
cc348ed
Compare
This PR:
accessors/
andbase/
by