Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(iroh-net): Also check the last packet in
MagicSock::poll_recv
#2650fix(iroh-net): Also check the last packet in
MagicSock::poll_recv
#2650Changes from 4 commits
473df5e
2d9a5e7
b9132e9
3cdaf08
318b3fa
ba30fa9
f71a02f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd prefer to call this "datagram", so
recv_gro_datagrams
.I think this is in line with the RFC9000 terminology:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, our log messages confuse this terminology too. one day that will be cleaned up too :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I went back and forth on that quite a bit.
Generally love any advice to consistent naming here. I've spent some time googling around, but people are arguing many ways.
You say "some packets can be coalesced together into a datagram", what kinds of packets are we talking about here?
This is super confusing to my ears because when I hear "packet" I think "IP packet". But I guess it can also mean "QUIC Packet"?