Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add GitHub Actions and CI status badge #13

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ErikBjare
Copy link
Member

@ErikBjare ErikBjare commented Dec 20, 2024

Added:

  • GitHub Actions workflow for running pre-commit checks and testing fork.sh
  • CI status badge to README

This PR serves as a test of the new GitHub Actions workflow.


Important

Adds GitHub Actions workflow for CI, updates README with CI status badge, and modifies documentation references.

  • GitHub Actions:
    • Adds test.yml workflow for push and pull_request events on master branch.
    • Workflow sets up Python 3.10, installs pre-commit, and tests fork.sh script.
  • README:
    • Adds CI status badge linking to test.yml workflow results.
  • Documentation:
    • Updates references from "Bob" to "gptme-agent" in ARCHITECTURE.md and TOOLS.md.
  • Scripts:
    • Updates check_markdown_links.py to skip template files.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 3fb6c39. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 8b4baa4 in 29 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 51 lines of code in 2 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/test.yml:13
  • Draft comment:
    - uses: actions/checkout@v3
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
    The checkout action v4 is stable and recommended. There's no apparent reason to downgrade to v3. The comment violates the rule about not commenting on dependency versions. GitHub Actions versions are effectively dependencies. We should assume the author chose v4 intentionally.
    Maybe there's a specific compatibility issue with v4 that the automated tool knows about? Maybe v3 is more widely tested and stable?
    Even if there were compatibility concerns, they would be caught during actual workflow runs. The author can easily revert to v3 if needed. We shouldn't speculate about potential issues.
    Delete this comment as it violates the rule about not commenting on dependency versions, and there's no clear evidence that v4 would cause any problems.

Workflow ID: wflow_QH3kjremjHKb0l4L


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on b076e0b in 16 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 16 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/test.yml:5
  • Draft comment:
    The workflow is set to run on the 'master' branch, but the PR description mentions the 'main' branch. Ensure consistency between the code and the description.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful.

Workflow ID: wflow_q2lCA2H26Po30APx


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 6f76b8e in 19 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 35 lines of code in 2 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. TOOLS.md:3
  • Draft comment:
    The changes in this file do not align with the PR description, which mentions adding a GitHub Actions workflow and a CI status badge. Please ensure the PR includes the intended changes.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful.

Workflow ID: wflow_pD3beiV9isaKkymD


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on fbce363 in 12 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 15 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/test.yml:31
  • Draft comment:
    Ensure that the fork.sh script doesn't already create these directories to avoid redundancy.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The mkdir command is used to create directories, which is necessary for the fork.sh script to run correctly. However, if the script itself is responsible for creating these directories, this step might be redundant. It's important to ensure that the script doesn't already handle this.

Workflow ID: wflow_GNcojwZghBBoDnY2


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 2d1cfb9 in 34 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 18 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/test.yml:36
  • Draft comment:
    The use of curly braces in the test command might not work as intended. Consider splitting it into separate test commands for each directory.
        test -d test-agent/tasks/active
        test -d test-agent/tasks/done
        test -d test-agent/tasks/new
        test -d test-agent/tasks/paused
        test -d test-agent/tasks/cancelled
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  1. Curly brace expansion is a standard feature in bash and works reliably. 2. The workflow is running on ubuntu-latest which uses bash. 3. This is a common and efficient way to test multiple directories. 4. The comment suggests a problem that doesn't exist and would make the code more verbose without benefit.
    Could there be shell environments where curly brace expansion doesn't work? Could this make the tests less clear?
    The workflow explicitly runs on ubuntu-latest which guarantees bash, and the syntax is clearer and more maintainable than separate commands.
    The comment should be deleted as it suggests fixing something that isn't broken and would make the code worse.

Workflow ID: wflow_nRQSlvfetnrVtrYq


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 7a22ec4 in 16 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 12 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/test.yml:30
  • Draft comment:
    Consider re-adding the directory verification steps to ensure fork.sh creates the expected directories. This helps catch potential issues with the script's execution.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful.

Workflow ID: wflow_JsH42LKtwNBpscDy


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

- Add template for daily journal entries with structured sections
- Update markdown link checker to skip template files

Co-authored-by: Bob <[email protected]>
Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 1546249 in 12 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 59 lines of code in 2 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. scripts/precommit/check_markdown_links.py:87
  • Draft comment:
    The condition to skip files in the examples and templates directories is correctly updated to include templates. This ensures that template files are not checked for broken links, which is appropriate for template content.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0%
    The code in check_markdown_links.py skips files in the examples and templates directories. This is a logical change to accommodate the new templates directory.

Workflow ID: wflow_S89M11NFithNDV6d


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 3fb6c39 in 41 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 35 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 0 drafted comments based on config settings.

Workflow ID: wflow_igfdz9pHsAgBQuHx


Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

fork:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider adding a step to set up Python in the 'fork' job, similar to the 'pre-commit' job, to ensure that Python is available for installing pre-commit.

@ErikBjare ErikBjare merged commit 46ae21f into master Dec 20, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant