Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update daily-notes.md #297

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Update daily-notes.md #297

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Craskermasker
Copy link

explicitly state that using a subdirectory for daily notes will prevent them from appearing in the graph visualisation.

explicitly state that using a subdirectory for daily notes will prevent them from appearing in the graph visualisation.
@ingalless
Copy link
Member

@Craskermasker I think we'd need some more testing on this...
I store my daily notes in the subdirectory /journal, and they appear on my graph. See

image

Do you think you can chuck together a repo that demonstrates the issue? Then we can get some debugging on it.

@Craskermasker
Copy link
Author

Sorry, I think this is a misunderstanding.

I don't want my daily notes appearing in the graph. as they clutter it up. I've put them in a different subdirectory /dailies. I thought this meant they were no longer indexed by the graph, but actually they are still on the graph, but not linked to any other nodes.

Is it possible to have an option to exclude subdirectories from the graph while still allowing them to link to other nodes?

@Craskermasker
Copy link
Author

Actually, on looking more closely at the settings, I think I've achieved this by adding my subdirectory **/dailies": true to the "files.exclude" and "files.watcherExclude" settings.

@ingalless
Copy link
Member

ingalless commented Oct 26, 2020

@Craskermasker The only thing to consider with those two settings is that this will also remove them from your explorer too, which may be undesirable.

The graph for Foam is currently handled by markdown links. There's a PR here that may be of interest

Paging @riccardoferretti - might be worth keeping in mind for the upcoming graph?

@Craskermasker
Copy link
Author

yeah it's not optimal, but it works all right for now. Thank you. I'll have a look at that.

@Craskermasker Craskermasker deleted the patch-1 branch October 26, 2020 09:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants