-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix missing sql_header for incremental models #2200
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
367eff7
(#2136) Fix missing sql_header for incremental models
drewbanin 4045510
Merge branch 'dev/octavius-catto' of github.com:fishtown-analytics/db…
drewbanin 3a5eb4c
Fix for bq insert_overwrite incrementals, add additional tests
drewbanin 579a6d6
Update changelog
drewbanin 29e2bbc
Merge branch 'dev/octavius-catto' into fix/sql-header-in-incrementals
drewbanin f3d4377
Merge branch 'dev/octavius-catto' into fix/sql-header-in-incrementals
drewbanin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions
15
test/integration/022_bigquery_test/models/sql_header_model_incr.sql
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
|
||
{{ config(materialized="incremental") }} | ||
|
||
{# This will fail if it is not extracted correctly #} | ||
{% call set_sql_header(config) %} | ||
CREATE TEMPORARY FUNCTION a_to_b(str STRING) | ||
RETURNS STRING AS ( | ||
CASE | ||
WHEN LOWER(str) = 'a' THEN 'b' | ||
ELSE str | ||
END | ||
); | ||
{% endcall %} | ||
|
||
select a_to_b(dupe) as dupe from {{ ref('view_model') }} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think, if we do this, then the
sql_header
will run twice for "dynamic" (scripting)insert_overwrite
materializations. (The first time will be when creating the temp table.) I assume that's ok?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a good call. Temporary UDFs can't be defined twice in the same BQ script. Think we're going to need to find an alternative approach here.
I kicked around the idea of making this a materialization-level thing, and while I think that might be a good approach long-term, I don't want to touch every dbt materialization in support of this change. Going to try to figure out a nice way to make this sensible for a very specific use case (insert_overwrite on BigQuery incremental models) and localize the jank as much as possible