-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bugfix]: Fixing bug in label generation for multiple groupbys #3594
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it a safe assumption that metric is always in position 0?
const label = column.map(s => verbose_map[s] || s).join(', ')
may be more elegant but it may "verbosify" dimension members instead of metrics (collisions are probably rare and not super problematic). This problem exist here too as in this current case column[0] could be a metric or a dimension member anyhow.Now I'm thinking verbosifying could be done in the backend where we know what is a metric or a dim member (this info is lost on the frontend). I know I said to verbosify it in the frontend earlier. What I wanted to avoid was using verbose names in dataframe column headers...
In any case I'll merge this to fix the bug and we can revisit later if needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, so my change for renaming on the backend is still around somewhere #3437.
Anyways your change #3563 as well as the original code also assumed it in the first position too.
There are some advantages (that we currently don't use) to do it in the front end.
E.g. we could have a checkbox that cloud switch between verbose and regular name or you could have custom verbose maps per slice instead of per datasource. And updating the charts would not require requests to the application.
So if we document and define that metrics always have to come before groupys we should be fine doing it in the UI.