-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 225
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for 3rd party integrations #291
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ | ||
[test_host] | ||
127.0.0.1 ansible_ssh_host=localhost ansible_ssh_user=vagrant ansible_ssh_port=2200 ansible_ssh_private_key_file=./ansible-datadog/tests/.vagrant/machines/default/virtualbox/private_key | ||
127.0.0.1 ansible_ssh_host=localhost ansible_ssh_user=vagrant ansible_ssh_port=2222 ansible_ssh_private_key_file=./ansible-datadog/manual_tests/.vagrant/machines/default/virtualbox/private_key |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In Saltstack, I'm doing a strict comparison for
item.value.third_party
: https://github.com/DataDog/datadog-formula/blob/4a82ce48cc95b7acada75633e7227811798e2a53/datadog/config.sls#L64because otherwise any truthy value works (eg. any non-empty string). Is that also the case here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's also the case here, I can make it explicit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By the way, I didn't find a way to define intermediate variables, so the condition is in the middle of the string. If there's a better way to write this in Ansible let me know :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You could maybe do something like:
We're already using this syntax here:
ansible-datadog/tasks/parse-version.yml
Lines 2 to 6 in e08729a
However, that assumes that
vars
works correctly withloop
(ie. thatitem
is correctly defined invars
), which I haven't tested.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It works and I find it slightly more readable, so I've changed it 👍