btrfs: qgroup: do not warn on record without old_roots populated

commit 7518140 upstream.

[BUG]
There are some reports from the mailing list that since v6.1 kernel, the
WARN_ON() inside btrfs_qgroup_account_extent() gets triggered during
rescan:

  WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 6424 at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:2756 btrfs_qgroup_account_extents+0x1ae/0x260 [btrfs]
  CPU: 3 PID: 6424 Comm: snapperd Tainted: P           OE      6.1.2-1-default Freescale#1 openSUSE Tumbleweed 05c7a1b1b61d5627475528f71f50444637b5aad7
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_qgroup_account_extents+0x1ae/0x260 [btrfs]
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x30c/0xb40 [btrfs c39c9c546c241c593f03bd6d5f39ea1b676250f6]
   ? start_transaction+0xc3/0x5b0 [btrfs c39c9c546c241c593f03bd6d5f39ea1b676250f6]
  btrfs_qgroup_rescan+0x42/0xc0 [btrfs c39c9c546c241c593f03bd6d5f39ea1b676250f6]
   btrfs_ioctl+0x1ab9/0x25c0 [btrfs c39c9c546c241c593f03bd6d5f39ea1b676250f6]
   ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0xa9/0x4a0
   ? mntput_no_expire+0x4a/0x240
   ? __seccomp_filter+0x319/0x4d0
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0
   do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x80
   ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x17/0x40
   ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
  RIP: 0033:0x7fd9b790d9bf
   </TASK>

[CAUSE]
Since commit e15e9f4 ("btrfs: introduce
BTRFS_QGROUP_RUNTIME_FLAG_NO_ACCOUNTING to skip qgroup accounting"), if
our qgroup is already in inconsistent state, we will no longer do the
time-consuming backref walk.

This can leave some qgroup records without a valid old_roots ulist.
Normally this is fine, as btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() would also skip
those records if we have NO_ACCOUNTING flag set.

But there is a small window, if we have NO_ACCOUNTING flag set, and
inserted some qgroup_record without a old_roots ulist, but then the user
triggered a qgroup rescan.

During btrfs_qgroup_rescan(), we firstly clear NO_ACCOUNTING flag, then
commit current transaction.

And since we have a qgroup_record with old_roots = NULL, we trigger the
WARN_ON() during btrfs_qgroup_account_extents().

[FIX]
Unfortunately due to the introduction of NO_ACCOUNTING flag, the
assumption that every qgroup_record would have its old_roots populated
is no longer correct.

Fix the false alerts and drop the WARN_ON().

Reported-by: Lukas Straub <[email protected]>
Reported-by: HanatoK <[email protected]>
Fixes: e15e9f4 ("btrfs: introduce BTRFS_QGROUP_RUNTIME_FLAG_NO_ACCOUNTING to skip qgroup accounting")
CC: [email protected] # 6.1
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

Author: adam900710

fs/btrfs/qgroup.c

@@ -2751,9 +2751,19 @@ int btrfs_qgroup_account_extents(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
 			      BTRFS_QGROUP_RUNTIME_FLAG_NO_ACCOUNTING)) {
 			/*
 			 * Old roots should be searched when inserting qgroup
-			 * extent record
+			 * extent record.
+			 *
+			 * But for INCONSISTENT (NO_ACCOUNTING) -> rescan case,
+			 * we may have some record inserted during
+			 * NO_ACCOUNTING (thus no old_roots populated), but
+			 * later we start rescan, which clears NO_ACCOUNTING,
+			 * leaving some inserted records without old_roots
+			 * populated.
+			 *
+			 * Those cases are rare and should not cause too much
+			 * time spent during commit_transaction().
 			 */
-			if (WARN_ON(!record->old_roots)) {
+			if (!record->old_roots) {
 				/* Search commit root to find old_roots */
 				ret = btrfs_find_all_roots(NULL, fs_info,
 						record->bytenr, 0,