You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
You have a cool feature allowing to group various apps together so that instead of setting individually 5 conditions with each of 5 apps you can declare an app group and use this single condition everywhere
I'd like to have the same for variables, so that instead of [:!mode_j :!mode_k :!mode_l :!mod_sc] condition (where every mode_X variable is a simple boolean 1/0) I could group these 4 modes into a single group_RightOR variable (which is 1 when either of the variables in a group is 1), thus
simplifying my conditions to [:!group_Right]
(more importantly) allowing to easily update the group in a single location rather then append a new [... :!mode_h] to every single definition
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You have a cool feature allowing to group various apps together so that instead of setting individually 5 conditions with each of 5 apps you can declare an app group and use this single condition everywhere
I'd like to have the same for variables, so that instead of
[:!mode_j :!mode_k :!mode_l :!mod_sc]
condition (where everymode_X
variable is a simple boolean1
/0
) I could group these 4 modes into a singlegroup_Right
OR variable (which is1
when either of the variables in a group is1
), thus[:!group_Right]
[... :!mode_h]
to every single definitionThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: