We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
One of the DOI links is improperly formatted in the paper draft -
xcdat/docs/paper/paper.bib
Line 79 in f995ec6
This is related to the review openjournals/joss-reviews#6426
This should just be the DOI ID portion (10.1029/2022MS003156), but instead includes the URL as well. Removing the prefix should fix this.
No response
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@tomvothecoder - looks like this commit resolves the issue 0d5a981
I think we can close this, as this issue refers to the PR not necessarily the main branch?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sounds good! Thanks @mgrover1
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
What happened?
One of the DOI links is improperly formatted in the paper draft -
xcdat/docs/paper/paper.bib
Line 79 in f995ec6
This is related to the review
openjournals/joss-reviews#6426
What did you expect to happen? Are there are possible answers you came across?
This should just be the DOI ID portion (10.1029/2022MS003156), but instead includes the URL as well. Removing the prefix should fix this.
Minimal Complete Verifiable Example (MVCE)
No response
Relevant log output
No response
Anything else we need to know?
No response
Environment
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: