Error WPS428 for ellipsis in @overload functions

[vnmabus]

Bug report

What's wrong

Functions decorated with the @overload decorator of the typing module should have an empty body, usually denoted with ellipsis, as in the default example:

@overload
def process(response: None) -> None:
    ...

However, WPS reports this usage as WPS428 Found statement that has no effect.

How it should be

Ellipsis should be accepted as the body of @overload functions.

[sobolevn]

Yes, we prefer adding docstrings instead of ... in each overload. So, this allow us to tell why whould you need each of this cases.

Example: https://github.com/dry-python/returns/blob/master/returns/methods/cond.py#L20

[vnmabus]

Yes, we prefer adding docstrings instead of ... in each overload. So, this allow us to tell why whould you need each of this cases.

Example: https://github.com/dry-python/returns/blob/master/returns/methods/cond.py#L20

Sorry, but this goes against standard practice, and the next version of pydocstyle will even flag it as an error D418 (see PyCQA/pydocstyle#511).

[sobolevn]

Thanks! I was not aware about this new rule in pydocstyle! We would need to swith off its rule for that.
I really believe that this solution is more readable than ....