Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 20, 2019. It is now read-only.

Support slot-based Shadow DOM v1 #430

Closed
lacolaco opened this issue Oct 30, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

Support slot-based Shadow DOM v1 #430

lacolaco opened this issue Oct 30, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@lacolaco
Copy link

Hi teams.
Are you planning to support Shadow DOM v1?
(Spec: http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/)

@ebidel
Copy link
Contributor

ebidel commented Oct 30, 2015

Definitely! We've discussed starting this work this quarter or the next. @tjsavage for timelines.

@tomalec
Copy link
Contributor

tomalec commented Feb 22, 2016

+1 for adding v1 support :)

It is mentioned in Polymer's 2016 Roadmap
It would be cool to see such roadmap for webcomponents.js as well.

Just to be able plan development, and decide according to which spec version should we code. Especially in regards of vanilla Web Components.

@ebidel
Copy link
Contributor

ebidel commented Feb 22, 2016

I think webcomponents.js support is implicit in supporting v1 in Polymer, but I could be wrong. cc @tjsavage @azakus @addyosmani

@tomalec
Copy link
Contributor

tomalec commented Feb 29, 2016

Once v1 will be shipped, will you still polyfill v0 more or less as Hayato proposed for Blink? https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/blob/6100444d54d8b759f456fb56fb263473494bf28c/proposals/shadow-dom-v1-in-blink.md

Will you use v0 in Chome to polyfill v1, or are you waiting for v1 to be complete in there?

@tomalec
Copy link
Contributor

tomalec commented Jun 30, 2016

Is there any update on this?

Implementation seems to be done in Chromium
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=531990#c127
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/blink-dev/zrZRD2ls5tw/ibbjD3cQAQAJ

@TimvdLippe
Copy link
Contributor

This has been done in https://github.com/webcomponents/shadydom

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants