You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Simple, mathematically correct rounded corners are often not the most visually pleasing ones. I do not know whether there are established formulas to determine the amount of additional protrusion necessary, but it is well known among graphic designers that there should be some.
CSS should have a property closely related to border-radius (or an additional value) that specifies the designer's intent to not have the border follow a perfect ellipse. Alternatively, CSS Backgrounds and Borders could suggest to implementers that they may do so automatically.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
SebastianZ
changed the title
[css-backgrounds] Optical correction for rounded corners
[css-borders] Optical correction for rounded corners
Aug 12, 2023
In the context of ”squircles“, I think this is sufficiently and more extensively covered by #6296 and #10653 now, so I will close this issue as a duplicate (though older).
Simple, mathematically correct rounded corners are often not the most visually pleasing ones. I do not know whether there are established formulas to determine the amount of additional protrusion necessary, but it is well known among graphic designers that there should be some.
CSS should have a property closely related to
border-radius
(or an additional value) that specifies the designer's intent to not have the border follow a perfect ellipse. Alternatively, CSS Backgrounds and Borders could suggest to implementers that they may do so automatically.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: