Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

find path need to enhance #2864

Closed
Reid00 opened this issue Sep 14, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

find path need to enhance #2864

Reid00 opened this issue Sep 14, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
community Source: who proposed the issue type/enhancement Type: make the code neat or more efficient

Comments

@Reid00
Copy link

Reid00 commented Sep 14, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

We plan to use Nebula instead of Neo4j, most of cases nebula work well. Every time we want to create new situation or replace the old with find path, it's failed.
I do much test, the same data and topology, nebula is much slower than neo4j, is there any possible to enhance this method?

Describe the solution you'd like
enhance the find path. i do some test. neo4j RT 31ms, but nebula need 1164ms, and nebula with more error rate.

image

image

Describe alternatives you've considered
No

Additional context
No

@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie transferred this issue from vesoft-inc/nebula-graph Sep 14, 2021
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie added the type/enhancement Type: make the code neat or more efficient label Sep 14, 2021
@CPWstatic
Copy link
Contributor

Could you please provide your queries? And do you use the Use statement in each test case?

@Reid00
Copy link
Author

Reid00 commented Sep 14, 2021

The core stmt is FIND SHORTEST PATH FROM a TO b OVER c,d,e,f,g UPTO 10 STEPS
I use Use SpaceName before the above stmt.
I have submitted a issue here https://discuss.nebula-graph.com.cn/t/topic/5727/15

@Reid00
Copy link
Author

Reid00 commented Jun 14, 2022

close since duplicate with #3221

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
community Source: who proposed the issue type/enhancement Type: make the code neat or more efficient
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants