Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

verification relationships are not expressed in did:web docs served by remote-server #618

Closed
mirceanis opened this issue Jul 14, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #619
Closed

verification relationships are not expressed in did:web docs served by remote-server #618

mirceanis opened this issue Jul 14, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #619
Assignees
@mirceanis
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mirceanis
Copy link
Member

The did core spec defines some verification relationships for the keys that are listed in the verificationMethod section of a DIDDocument.
Veramo should express keys that can sign as assertionMethod and authentication(already done) and key agreement compatible keys as keyAgreement.

The existing did-web-provider doesn't have a way to mark some keys for a particular function, so, for now, they can only be mapped based on type.
@mirceanis mirceanis added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels Jul 14, 2021
@mirceanis mirceanis self-assigned this Jul 14, 2021
mirceanis added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 14, 2021
@mirceanis
feat(remote-server): express keys properly in did:web doc
53bf1d7 
fixes #618
@mirceanis mirceanis mentioned this issue Jul 14, 2021
Merged
mirceanis added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 14, 2021
@mirceanis
feat(remote-server): express keys properly in did:web doc
c33e39e 
fixes #618
@mirceanis mirceanis mentioned this issue Jul 14, 2021
Merged
jasheal pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 16, 2021
@mirceanis @jasheal
feat(remote-server): express keys properly in did:web doc
f019877 
fixes #618
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mirceanis mirceanis

Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
1 participant
@mirceanis