-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 184
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Baked data is bigger than postcard data #5429
Comments
For list the explanation is that the data struct contains 10 cows (4 patterns of 1 cow, and two conditions of 3 cows each), but usually only encodes tiny texts ( |
"baked size" here is the size of the .rs file, yes? |
no, an estimate for in-memory size, ignoring |
|
If you tell me what PSS is I might be able to answer this |
list/and@1 also showed up, but I didn't take the time to copy it into the table; I tried to include a representative cross-section in the OP. "baked size" refers to the in-memory size based on the These numbers are roughly reflective of what happens when I compile ICU4X with the |
Note: I have some measurements in #1317 (comment) that illustrate the two types of binary size consumed by the baked data: the strings themselves ( |
I computed fingerprints.csv based on both
baked_size
andpostcard_size
.Baked is equal in size or bigger than postcard for every data marker. A selection of the biggest offenders by overall size or percentage:
The good news is that many of these keys will be improved under #5230 or #5379.
Should we do anything?
@robertbastian @Manishearth
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: