Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

baseline directory does not exist on Cheyenne #1843

Closed
uturuncoglu opened this issue Jul 26, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by #1845
Closed

baseline directory does not exist on Cheyenne #1843

uturuncoglu opened this issue Jul 26, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by #1845
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@uturuncoglu
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

The following baseline directory does not exist /glade/scratch/epicufsrt/GMTB/ufs-weather-model/RT/NEMSfv3gfs/develop-20230720 on Cheyenne.

To Reproduce:

What compilers/machines are you seeing this with? Cheyenne / INTEL
Give explicit steps to reproduce the behavior.

  1. git clone --recursive https://github.com/ufs-community/ufs-weather-model.git
  2. cd ufs-weather-model/tests
  3. ./rt.sh -k -n cpld_control_p8 intel
  4. check logs/log_cheyenne/rt_001_cpld_control_p8_intel.log

Additional context

N/A

Output

baseline dir = /glade/scratch/epicufsrt/GMTB/ufs-weather-model/RT/NEMSfv3gfs/develop-20230720/cpld_control_p8_intel
working dir  = /glade/scratch/turuncu/FV3_RT/rt_53753/cpld_control_p8_intel
Checking test 001 cpld_control_p8_intel results ....
 Comparing sfcf021.tile1.nc ............MISSING baseline
 Comparing sfcf021.tile2.nc ............MISSING baseline
 Comparing sfcf021.tile3.nc ............MISSING baseline
 Comparing sfcf021.tile4.nc ............MISSING baseline
@uturuncoglu uturuncoglu added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 26, 2023
@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @uturuncoglu. We had an issue with running tests on Cheyenne for a while. I'm not sure when the next baselines will be created on Cheyenne, but maybe today or tomorrow.

@uturuncoglu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@DeniseWorthen Thanks. It is good to know. I am trying to run full regression test in there to finalize testing of my upcoming component land PR. So, it would be nice to have the baseline. I could test it on Orion too if it will take time.

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator

@uturuncoglu Thanks. I also want to be sure you are aware of #1807 for the signs of export fields. This PR will ensure that all fields exported to CMEPS have a consistent positive-down definition. I'm not sure whether you will rely on these fv3atm export fields or not.

@uturuncoglu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@DeniseWorthen Thanks for heads up. I did not do anything special about the signs at least for the component land. Once this is in, I could test it in my case.

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm going to close this issue since Cheyenne is w/in 10days of EOL.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants