-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 579
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Intrepid2: New errors in charon regression tests #8562
Comments
@trilinos/intrepid2 |
I'd like to be updated on this issue. I have "subscribed," but @glhenni has been unable to add me directly. |
Apologies for the inconvinience. We merged a huge PR (#8457) over the weekend by @CamelliaDPG. |
@glhenni - can you send a stack trace? |
@glhenni I believe @mperego is likely right in the hypothesis he's suggesting. We added new optional arguments to
We also added a check that |
I'll try and get a stack trace. It's definitely a parallel issue as it doesn't happen in a serial run. My guess would be a boundary issue of some kind where none of the entities reside on a particular node in the parallel run but there's some invocation of an evaluator being done on that node with a zero-size workset. |
Drekar is also seeing compile failures. https://github.com/rppawlo/DrekarTransfer/issues/520 |
charon stack trace:
|
at frame 7 of the stack trace, you see that |
I think I've figured out how to avoid the invocations in charon in the case of empty worksets. There was already a boolean set if the workset was empty I just had to wrap two calls to |
This issue has had no activity for 365 days and is marked for closure. It will be closed after an additional 30 days of inactivity. |
This issue was closed due to inactivity for 395 days. |
Bug Report
@trilinos/<Intrepid2>
Description
Over the weekend our testing that links against Trilinos/develop threw errors from Intrepid2 that we haven't seen before. The error we're seeing is:
The failing tests were all finite-volume tests, what we refer to as Scharfetter Gummel, or SG tests, but the majority of SG tests passed so I'm not sure what makes the 4 that failed different.
Any suggestions on where to look for the problem?
Making sure @rppawlo and @karapeterson see this as they may have some insights.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: