You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 16, 2024. It is now read-only.
In the TC39 meeting today (2021-may-26) @waldemarhorwat commented on our proposed new character class syntax allowing identity escapes of more symbol/punctuation characters than the existing syntax, and asked whether the existing Unicode/u syntax should be extended to allow identity escapes for the same larger set.
In the current version of the proposed spec changes, the additional characters allowed in identity escapes inside character classes are
ClassHalfOfDouble :: one of & - ! # % , : ; < = > @ _ ` ~
Seems like a good idea. Anyone opposed?
Also, in the existing Unicode mode, a dash can be escaped inside a character class but not outside. Might want to allow that everywhere.
Should these simply be added to CharacterEscape via IdentityEscape, allowing them even outside of character classes?
Should this be done as part of the spec changes for this proposal, or separately?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the TC39 meeting today (2021-may-26) @waldemarhorwat commented on our proposed new character class syntax allowing identity escapes of more symbol/punctuation characters than the existing syntax, and asked whether the existing Unicode/
u
syntax should be extended to allow identity escapes for the same larger set.In the current version of the proposed spec changes, the additional characters allowed in identity escapes inside character classes are
ClassHalfOfDouble :: one of & - ! # % , : ; < = > @ _ ` ~
Seems like a good idea. Anyone opposed?
Also, in the existing Unicode mode, a dash can be escaped inside a character class but not outside. Might want to allow that everywhere.
Should these simply be added to CharacterEscape via IdentityEscape, allowing them even outside of character classes?
Should this be done as part of the spec changes for this proposal, or separately?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: