You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Yes, but orthogonal.
There's no hash of a set of coins.
There's a hash of each transaction, and each transaction signs an existing hash from the ledger.
Ethereum uses a globally unique counter, as I understand. A performance choke point.
And probably a security hole, since two forks could have the same counter.
@tolyloom, we should add these details to the whitepaper. They're unique optimizations enabled by proof-of-history.
Only requires proof-of-order, technically, which Bitcoin implements with UTXOs. That's a clunky way to do it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, but orthogonal.
There's no hash of a set of coins.
There's a hash of each transaction, and each transaction signs an existing hash from the ledger.
Ethereum uses a globally unique counter, as I understand. A performance choke point.
And probably a security hole, since two forks could have the same counter.
@tolyloom, we should add these details to the whitepaper. They're unique optimizations enabled by proof-of-history.
Only requires proof-of-order, technically, which Bitcoin implements with UTXOs. That's a clunky way to do it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: