Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Make expect_range() and chk_range() consistent #28

Closed
kinto-b opened this issue Feb 9, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

Make expect_range() and chk_range() consistent #28

kinto-b opened this issue Feb 9, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
Effort: ⭐ Straightforward Importance: ❗ Desirable
Milestone
testdat 0.2.0

Comments

@kinto-b
Copy link
Contributor

kinto-b commented Feb 9, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Currently expect_range() has a ... argument which lets the user supply allowable point values lying outside the [min, max] interval. There is no reason why chk_range() shouldn't do the same thing.

If we do this and #27, we can consolidate value-expectations with chk-expect
@kinto-b kinto-b added Effort: ⭐ Straightforward Importance: ❗ Desirable labels Feb 9, 2021
@kinto-b kinto-b added this to the testdat 0.2.0 milestone Feb 9, 2021
@kinto-b kinto-b closed this as completed in c401ffe Sep 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Effort: ⭐ Straightforward Importance: ❗ Desirable
Projects
None yet
Milestone
testdat 0.2.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@kinto-b